Benford's law — methodology

This page explains why the Benford test exists, why we prefer the second-digit test (2BL) to the first-digit test for election data, what thresholds we apply, and how MAD and χ² should be read. The goal is to make transparent both what the test can and cannot say.

What you'll find

  • Why the first-digit test often shows "deviation" on clean electoral data.
  • Why 2BL (second digit) is preferred — Mebane's line of work.
  • Thresholds: minimum 10 votes per section, minimum 30 sections per party.
  • MAD bands: Close to Benford / Moderate / Strong deviation.

For the live screen see Benford's law by party.

Explore the data

  • Home
  • Governance
  • National Assembly
  • Roll-call votes
  • Governments
  • MP business connections
  • Public procurement
  • State budget
  • EU funds
  • Indicators
  • Consumption
  • Prices
  • Party financing
  • Opinion polls
  • Seat simulator
  • Parties
  • Results by region
  • Extraordinary local elections
  • Local-elections reconciliation
  • Sofia
  • About the project

Recent analysis

  • Ask Naiasno: a new way to explore Bulgaria’s public data
  • The money map: where the state buys and where the money goes
  • We are opening up the procurement risk flags